THE PURPOSES THAT BOUNDARIES SERVE
URL: http://www.spatialgovernance.com/spatial/boundaries/620-01.htm
© John S. Cook - Created on 12 July 2004
Last modified 05/04/11 11:01 Australian EST

 

INTRODUCTION

Spatial Orientation and Governance in Society
Practically all societies develop a spatial knowledge about what behaviour is permitted and what is taboo in particular places. The ability to generate knowledge and maintain understandings at international, interstate, and local levels is fundamental in achieving a spatial orientation to human activity. Just as information and communication are essential to organisation, so is spatial information and its communication essential to spatial organisation in society.

Oral and Written Communication
Hunter-gathering societies had customary laws relating to their lands. They kept the knowledge of these laws alive through their oral traditions. Nowadays, these oral traditions provide a basis for the recognising rights of indigenes throughout the world. Australia now recognises these customary laws through native title legislation. 

Cadastral surveying has origins that go back as far as the invention of writing. The spatial organisation of early 'hydraulic' civilisations involved sophisticated arrangements for their management and control. Until recently, much of the understanding of cadastral organisation in the ancient world centred on Egypt and many surveying text books reflect this understanding. However, more modern archaeological research suggests that the area around modern day Iraq, Syria and Turkey may have been a cradle of civilisation and cadastral organisation.

Controlling by Enrolling
In French, cadastre is a 'register of the survey of land', cadastrer means 'to survey', cadastral refers to a land register, and côntroler means - among other things - 'to register, to put on rolls, to enrol'. Thus, the etymology of these words shows a clear association between ideas about controlling and enrolling.

With the advent of parchments and papers as a medium on which records could be kept, the rights and obligations of people in respect of land came to be recorded on rolls. Thus property rolls for taxation purposes became important to government finance generally. However, in establishing an 'address' in the physical sense for land, the public record became an address in a conceptual sense for other things, such as availability of personnel to form a militia. Nowadays, this use of an identifiable land parcel as a conceptual address for other information pertinent to governance generally, as in delivery of postage and other goods and service. This multipurpose role of the cadastre forms the rationale for what is known nowadays as a multipurpose cadastre.

Historical Inquests into English Land Tenure Arrangements
Understandings about English history owe much to two inquests about land holdings for taxation and general purposes of administration. William 1 - the Conqueror - commissioned an inquest in 1086 known as the Domesday Survey. Edward 1 commissioned similar surveys between 1274 and 1284 that were contained in records known as the Hundred Rolls. The 'hundred' was an administrative area - a subdivision of a County - and thought to comprise about 100 living areas known as Hides.

Lord Chancellor and Master of the Rolls
In the UK, the Lord Chancellor is the most senior judicial officer and responsible for the Land Registry Office and the Public Records Office. Historically, the Lord Chancellor was the adviser to the monarch on delivery of justice through the court system. Maintenance of some public records is a responsibility of the third most senior judicial officer known as Master of the Rolls. The title has fourteenth century origins and reflects the ancient use of rolls, especially in keeping records about land and proceedings of the king's courts.

References:
bullet

John F. Brock, 'The oldest cadastral plan ever found: the Catalhoyuk Town Plan of 6200 B.C.', Spatial Odyssey: Proceedings of the 42nd Australian Surveyors Congress held at Brisbane, Queensland (25-28 September 2001)

bullet

Curtis Maitland Brown and Winfield H. Eldridge, Evidence and procedures for boundary location, (New York: Wiley, 1962), pp.67-138 (being  Chapter 3 - 'Historical development of property surveying')

bullet

UK Government - Public Records Office - Home Page | David Roffe - Home Page - Lectures > Domesday: the Inquest and the Book - The Hundred Rolls 

bullet

National Library of Australia - Home Page > MapsCadastral Maps

bullet

Google search - 'land title registration' - 'cadastral system' - 'Domesday survey' - 'hundred rolls' - 'manor rolls'

BOUNDARIES - TERRITORY, CONCEPTS AND AUTHORITY

Pervasiveness of Spatial Terminology
People can relate in a physical sense to organising or arranging tangible things into separate physical spaces, compartments, pigeonholes or parcels. This division of space implies some understanding of the limits or boundaries of these divisions. However, people can also envisage the arrangement, categorisation or classification of information and ideas using allegories of space and time. In other words, they can imagine the placement of intangible things - such as the things that people have in mind - into imaginary space. These issues become especially relevant in linking ideas about surveying and mapping with other information.

Spatial terminology is pervasive and intimately bound up in the logic and coherence of language used to describe and interpret things and events of general and scientific interest. It is not unusual to speak of:
bullet

 'fields' or 'areas' of study or interest - which open up Taxonomies, Categorizations, Classifications, Categories, and Directories

bullet

'topics' - with etymological links to ‘topical’, ‘commonplace’ and ‘common ground’: and to words prefixed by 'topo' as in ‘toponymy’ or place names: ‘topology’ and ‘topography’

bullet

historical study concerns ‘turning points’, ‘watersheds’ and milestones in human experience

bullet

 

‘Things’ find expression generally in nouns and noun phrases. Events, happenings or actions find expression through verbs. Since things and events occur somewhere in physical, mental or social space, the association of nouns, verbs and space becomes deeply embedded in the language.

As an example, the word ‘topic’ has  ‘Trivia’ has connotations and etymological links with ordinary conversation that takes place before people branch and go their separate ways. Similarly, . Personal and mass communication occurs in channels, along pathways or super highways.

Logic

Set theory and Venn diagrams explicitly acknowledge that meanings of words and phrases and classifications of things as mental spaces that may be mutually exclusive, or overlapping or layered. Fuzzy logic explicitly acknowledges the fuzzy or inexact boundaries that exist between how people may be inclined to classify words and phrases.

Fuzzy Boundaries

 

Creating Space
 

References:
bullet

Google search - 'conceptual boundaries' - 'boundaries of authority' - 'boundaries of responsibility' - 'fuzzy boundaries'

bullet

 

IMPORTANCE OF BOUNDARIES TO A RULE OF LAW

The Idea of a Rule of Law
In essence, the idea inherent in a rule of law is that people can know the law and be guided by it. Since legal rules differ on either side of a legal boundary, knowledge about boundaries becomes an essential part of the information needed to sustain operation of a rule of law. People need to know not only what are are permitted to do but also the place where that permission applies. These rules become more complex to cope with requirements for 'sustainable development' in the use of resources in the natural and built environments. Accordingly, description of land for legal purposes becomes increasingly complex to meet the ideal of a rule of law.

Importance to Human Rights
The preamble to the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights the (UDHR) expresses an international consensus that human rights should be protected by a rule of law. The UDHR refers at s.17 to rights regarding property and at s.27(2) to ownership of intellectual property as fundamental human rights. Occupying space and accessing resources is essential to human survival. Accordingly, denying a person of a right to occupy space somewhere is to deny a fundamental human right to exist. 

Importance to Government
The idea of a rule of law is fundamental to modern government. The framework of cadastral boundaries as shown on official cadastral maps serves not only property transactions but also a variety of additional administrative functions. Thus, preserving knowledge of the boundaries of Queensland is important in applying the laws of Queensland. Similarly, the electoral system, depends on knowledge of electoral boundaries; local government, on local government boundaries; and so on. The Survey and Mapping Infrastructure Act 2003 deals, among other things, with boundaries of the State and internal administrative boundaries.

Importance to Economic Development
A rule of law is also important to the conduct of commerce. Organising rights about property in ways that become more conventional or standardised - thus involving fewer unnecessary variations in understandings and procedures at the local level - is important in reducing the complexity of transactions at regional and global levels. Wider geographical reach provides greater opportunities, for good and bad to occur. Good things can occur if wider opportunities for trade benefit local people. Outcomes are less desirable if wider geographical reach allows undue exploitation of local people.

Recent writings of Hernando de Soto relate real property institutions and cadastral organisation to economic development. De Soto points out that the capacity to specify rights to land is important in developing a capacity to govern more generally, especially in allowing equitable forms of local government taxation.


 

 

References:
bullet

John S. Cook, 'The influence of human rights on land rights and spatial information', Spatial Odyssey: Proceedings of the 42nd National Congress of the Institution of Surveyors, Australia held at Brisbane, Queensland (25-28 September 2001) - [0109jsc.pdf] - 75KB - Portable Document Format

bullet

United Nations > Home Page > Human Rights > Universal Declaration of Human Rights

bullet

Hernando de Soto, Why capitalism triumphs in the West and fails everywhere else, London: Bantam, 2000
World Bank Group
- Home > News > 'Hernando de Soto Asks Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West and Fails Everywhere Else
Policy Library - Home > de Soto | Economic Reform Today  > Property Rights and Democracy > Securing Property Rights

BOUNDARY CLASSIFICATIONS

Bases for Classification of Boundaries

Examples

Classification According to Purpose
bulletJurisdictional boundaries - boundaries between self-governing states and nations as recognised in federal constitutions or in international laws
bulletAdministrative boundaries in government - identifying the spatial limits to the jurisdiction of - electoral boundaries, local government boundaries, and the administrative jurisdictions of various government agencies
bulletNon-government administrative boundaries - identifying the spatial limits of various non-government activities - as in commercial, sporting and recreational, ecclesiastical
bulletProperty boundaries - identifying the spatial limits to rights of owners and co-owners to lots and common property
Classification as Natural or Artificial Boundaries
bulletNatural boundaries - rivers, creeks, watercourses, edges of mangrove or other vegetation, seashores, edges of tidal waters, edges of cliffs,  
bulletArtificial boundaries - boundaries identifiable on the ground at the time of their creation by survey marks or other features of the built environment 
Classification as Fixed and General Boundaries
bulletFixed boundaries - boundaries supposedly fixed in their location by cadastral surveying methods
bulletGeneral boundaries - this term originated in the UK and referred to a situation where customary knowledge of boundaries between properties was preferable to attempting to fix boundaries by cadastral surveying methods and records

References:
bullet

S. Rowton Simpson, Land law and registration, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976, Chapter 8 - 'Boundaries and maps', pp.125-158

bullet

 

JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES

The Nature of Jurisdictional Boundaries
Self-governing states have a general power to make laws within the boundaries of their separate jurisdictions. These boundaries have significance within the context of constitutional and international law. The principal jurisdictional boundaries in Australia involve State and federal territories. As Australian colonies became self-governing, the Imperial legislation that founded the new governments also described the new colonial boundaries. generally, these boundaries were to be established on the ground by inter-colonial agreement. Thus, the new colonies had responsibility for land administration and alienation up to the limits of the colonial boundaries. These became known as State boundaries after federation in 1901.

Of particular significance is Australia's maritime boundary. This involves the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) together with other agreements with Papua New Guinea, Timor and Indonesia. Moreover, the extent of the States' jurisdictions is limited and the Commonwealth has jurisdiction over significant off-shore areas. Thus some aspects of management of the Great Barrier Reef fall within a federal jurisdiction. As an example, the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority is an agency of the federal government.

Maritime Boundaries
The establishment of maritime boundaries poses special problems of border protection. Moreover, conventional marking on land surveys is impractical at sea. 

The Treaty of Tokehega (1983) provides a written description of an international maritime boundary between the New Zealand government acting on behalf of Tokelauan people and the United States government representing interest in American Samoa. Taking effect on 3 September 1983, the Treaty is unusual in being written in both the English and Tokelauan languages. The Treaty is of interest here in at least three respects:
bulletThe problem of translating Anglo-American legal concepts into the Tokelauan language - a general problem in dealing with the land rights of indigenes
bulletThe use of geodetic coordinates and concepts that were probably not entirely understood by the signatories - an indication of the faith placed in surveyors and their technology 
bulletThe brining together of concepts and techniques of geodetic, hydrographic and cadastral surveying to govern territorial sovereignty and proprietary rights 

References:
bullet

Australian Government - Department of Environment and Heritage - Home Page > Protected Area Management Agencies > Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority | Geoscience Australia - Home Page > Topographic Mapping > Australian Maritime Boundaries

bullet

Pacific Islands Legal Information Institute - PacLII > Databases > South Pacific Treaties > Treaty between the United States of America and New Zealand on the Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Tokelau and the United States of America [1980] SPT 3

ADMINISTRATIVE BOUNDARIES IN GOVERNMENT

The Nature of Administrative Boundaries
Many agencies of government have statutory authority to prescribe administrative areas to assist in performing governmental functions. The Federal, State and Territory court systems: Federal, State, Territory and local electoral systems, local governments and the like have prescribed geographical areas for various purposes.

The thing that administrative boundaries have in common is that some rules that apply on one side of the boundary differ from those that apply on the other side. In these circumstances, the boundary of an administrative district may become important in deciding whether or not a rule has been broken and whether penalties apply or charges are due.

The declaration of some administrative areas is politically sensitive. Parliament often refers the fixing and changing of these administrative boundaries to independent commissions. Examples include electoral divisions and local government areas.

Administrative Boundaries in Queensland
The Queensland Government enacted the Administrative Boundaries Terminology Act 1985 to set out standards appropriate to the description of administrative boundaries. The Act described an 'administrative district' as 'an area of the State declared or established under or for the purposes of any Act, whether declared or established before or after the commencement of this Act.' 

The Survey and Mapping Infrastructure Act 2003 at s.72 repealed the Administrative Boundaries Terminology Act 1985 and the Survey Coordination Act 1952. Many of the repealed provisions were re-enacted in the  new and consolidated 2003 Act. In effect, the boundaries of the State, its internal administrative areas and its further subdivision into lots and road areas all have legal significance insofar as the rules applying on one side of a boundary differ in some way from the rules that apply on the other side.

 

Reference:
bullet

Queensland Electoral Commission - Home Page > Maps and Reviews > State Redistributions - Local Government Boundary Reviews - Boundaries, district maps and profiles

NON-GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATIVE BOUNDARIES

many non-government organisations adopt boundaries for purposes of their own administration. Historically, ecclesiastical boundaries have

Sport

Recreation and Sport
 

References:
bullet

 

PROPERTY BOUNDARIES

Property Boundaries
Property boundaries arise initially between the State and a private person in an original land grant. Other boundaries emerge in roads and other lands retained by the State for public purposes and as un-alienated State land. In many instances, State and Commonwealth authorities hold lands as freehold land registered in the freehold land register.

Boundaries Between Private Persons
Given a land grant from the State of freehold land to person A, A may subdivide the land into two portions and transfer one of the parcels to person B. In effect, this transfer has created a boundary between A and B and is subject to:
bulletlegal requirements for written documentation of the intentions of parties to a contract for a sale of land
bulletlegal requirements for registration of documents in a public register

The Nemo Dat Principle
The legal principle - often expressed in the maxim of nemo dat (or more fully as nemo dat quod non habet) - is that no one gives who possesses not, meaning that no one can give a title to something greater than what he or she possesses. Thus a lessee may grant a sub-lease provided that the rights contained in the sub-lease do not exceed the time, or the conditions or the area of first lease.

The Nemo Dat Principle and Fixed Boundaries
A
cannot lawfully subdivide  land in a way that encroaches on the rights of B. Similarly, B cannot lawfully encroach on the rights of A. The boundary created by the transfer from A to B remains fixed in location until either:
bullet

the parties owning land on either side of a boundary agree to a change in its location by reconfiguring their respective lots; or

bullet

some action authorised by law prevails to require a change in its location - notably title by possession


Statute of Limitations and Title by Possession
Briefly, two situations arise, each with their own implications for public policy:
bullet

a new owner can become entitled to a whole parcel - which involves a new owner without changes to existing boundaries

bullet

a new owner may become entitled to part of a parcel - which involves both a new owner and changes to boundary locations

A conflict can arise between public policy pertaining to the Statute of Limitations and public policy regarding land registration. Different jurisdictions can resolve this potential for conflict in different ways.

References:

 

VERTICAL AND STRATIFIED BOUNDARIES

Geodetic Considerations in Cadastral Surveying
Usually, cadastral plans and maps indicate a pattern of land parcels and entitlements over separate areas of the earth's surface. In terms of plane geometry, boundaries are vertical planes that intersect a horizontal plane in lines as shown on plans and maps. In terms of a global geometry, boundaries are surfaces passing through lines on the ground towards the centre of the earth. The lines on the ground form part of a curved surface that requires accommodation of some distortion to allow representation on the plane surface of a plan or map. In other words, cadastral surveying over extensive areas requires consideration of geodetic surveying problems and map projections.

Depth and Height of Entitlements
The maxim cuius est solum eius est usque ad coelum et ad inferos implies ownership of land from the centre of the earth to the heavens. A trespass can involve an incursion into airspace above the land or a tunnelling or mining operation beneath the surface of the land. Ownership of airspace becomes a matter of practical possession in economic terms. Otherwise, an aircraft flying overhead or even a satellite becomes a trespass.

Public Policy For Efficient Resource Use
Public policy needs to address a number of issues involving rights to land above and below the surface of the earth to achieve a more efficient use of resources. These issues include:
bulletThe separation of surface and subsurface rights to allow mining of mineral and other resources
bulletThe permanent occupation of above ground and  underground space for building projections, car parking, and the like.
bulletThe temporary occupation of space above or underground belonging to another person to allow access for construction or maintenance

Queensland law now admits considerable variety in possible arrangements in dealing with freehold land through registration of building format and volumetric format plans under the Land Titles Act 1994. A statutory right of user is available under the Property Law Act 1974. The law related to mining allows mining tenure to exist underground with and without rights to the surface.

References:
bullet

John S. Cook and Sep L. Humphries, 'Trespass into airspace', Australian Surveyor, Vol.3 No.1 (March 1993) pp.32-38

BOUNDARY SURVEYING

Boundary Creation and Reinstatement
An important function performed exclusively by cadastral surveyors is to mark and describe lands to allow particular property transactions to proceed. Under the principle of nemo dat, a surveyor needs to reinstate the existing boundaries of his client's land before doing any further work in reconfiguring boundaries. In early colonial and developmental stages, a surveyor's client was likely to be the government.

Experience showed that people performing cadastral surveying functions needed both skills and integrity in operating as an agent of government. This led to systems of licensing persons who were suitably qualified to perform cadastral surveys on making original grants of land from the Crown. The need extended to controls over persons making surveys in subsequent dealings with land after it had been granted as freehold land from the Crown.

Origins of Cadastral Surveying
Ancient writings from Egypt and the Roman times provides evidence of rope-stretchers and land measurers. The Roman term 'agrimensor' remains in use in Spanish- and Portuguese-speaking countries. Some evidence suggests an earlier and even more significant early cadastral history occurred in area around modern day Iraq, Syria and Turkey.

Cadastral Surveying and British Colonisation
The British government oversaw numerous colonisation ventures that involved significant territorial expansions. Surveying technology generally improved to meet the demands of these maritime and colonial ventures. Colonisation introduced new challenges of land administration and land alienation over extensive new areas. Many of the procedures associated with modern cadastral surveying has its evolution in this period of active British colonisation.

Forms of Administration
The forms of administration in early colonisation usually saw appointment of three important officers:
bulleta Governor with a Great Seal of the Colony to make orders, declarations, official appointments, grants of land and the like.
bulleta secretary to the governor to run an office to support the creation of documents and the keeping of records
bulleta Surveyor-general as an agent of the Crown to attend, among other things, to the the technical description of lands and territories for purposes of legal documentation

The Problem of Surveying Standards
However simple it may have seemed to lay out land parcels on the ground and describe what was laid out in written documentation, experience showed that it was in fact more difficult to do than most people imagined. A system of proving the competence of surveyors emerged at an early stage . Initially this was done within a public service structure as a condition of appointment. However, other concerns such as continuity of employment for salaried officers was a political concern. Out of this grew a practice of licensing surveyors to act on behalf of government in creating, perpetuating and assessing evidence of boundary location.

In practice, it is not so much licensing surveyors per se that overcomes the problems of boundary evidence. What matters more is the knowledge, skills, attitudes and diligence that surveyors bring to bear on their task. Understanding the purpose and rationale behind rules and conventions is important to efficient operation of  a cadastral system. There is nothing necessarily professional about blind obedience to rules that may be inappropriate in particular circumstances.

References:
bullet

A. G. Brown, Law relating to land boundaries and surveying, (Brisbane, Queensland: Association of Consulting Surveyors Queensland, 1980) pp.191-205
Curtis Maitland Brown and Winfield H. Eldridge,  Evidence and procedures for boundary location, (New York: Wiley, 1962) pp.1-138 and 458-468

bullet

United States Bureau of Land Management - Alaska State Office > Cadastral Survey and Geomatics > Summary of Cadastral Survey in the United States - John Zink, 'Cadastral Survey--Ensuring the Domestic Tranquillity'

bullet

University of Melbourne - Department of Geomatics

GUARANTEE OF BOUNDARIES

A Cautionary Note
A belief has grown in connection with the system of cadastral boundaries in Australian jurisdictions and in some other places, that the system of surveyed boundaries affords some form of guarantee. The idea that boundaries may be fixed as a matter of principle does not always mean that they can be regarded as fixed in practice. The problem becomes one of how can it be decided that a location thought now to be a boundary is actually the location in which the boundary was first created.

The idea of a 'fixed' boundary follows from the nemo dat principle. Provided that the original location of a boundary can be identified and determined with some certainty,  there can also be a reasonable certainty that the land of an adjoining owner will not be encroached upon in subsequent transactions. Conversely, uncertainty regarding the original location of a boundary increases the risk that a person may encroach unknowingly on the land of another. But therein is the nub of the problem for how is it possible to introduce certainty into a situation that is inherently uncertain.

The Problem of Uncertainty
The problem of uncertainty is essentially one of being without information. The only way to overcome being without information is to supply information. New information might come from three sources:
bulletthe finding of new information or evidence - but if surveyors have been diligent, the chances of finding new and relevant evidence may be remote
bulletthe reconsideration of what can be inferred from existing information or evidence - a matter of honesty and reasonableness as a professional witness in not manufacturing evidence one way or another
bulleta declaration by an ultimate authority concerning the 'truth' of the matter - and in recognising the court system as an ultimate authority, the duty of the surveyor is to understand the precedent that courts are likely to follow arriving at new decisions

In large measure, this identifies important professional responsibilities of cadastral surveyors.

References:
bullet

S. Rowton Simpson, Land law and registration, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976, Chapter 8 - 'Boundaries and maps', pp.137-140

bullet

Registrar General v Rigby [1995] NSWLEC 106 | Westfield v Registrar-General of NSW [2003] NSWCA 343