A SYSTEMS APPROACH TO MONITORING
URL: http://www.spatialgovernance.com/governance/monitoring/613-05A.htm
© John S. Cook - Created on 7 June 2005
Last modified 05/04/11 11:01 Australian EST

 

INTRODUCTION

some systems involve considerable complexity - workings are difficult to understand

diffucult to understand

 

 

The separation of powers that exists in many modern governments provides a basis for analysing decision making processes. It also helps to identify particular opportunities where bias might arise. This identifies:
bulletthe legislature in making laws - involving the politics of community consultation, the actions of various pressure groups and lobbies, the deliberations of the legislature in formulating laws and the politics of law reform in changing the laws
bulletthe executive in administering laws - involving executive decision making in respect of administering various laws as well as the problems of rivalry and difficulties in communication between various government agencies
bulletthe judiciary in adjudicating on the laws - legal decision making in interpreting laws and resolving disputes based on the evidence of experts acting as 'hired guns' for various protagonists

In addition to decision making by government, commercial decision making takes place within the legal environment established by the government and decisions . as well as some understanding of the vested interests of various protagonists.

The problem of satisfying economic conditions is exacerbated and injustice is inevitable if there are serious doubts about supposed environmental consequences. Ecosystems are complex, and understanding is limited. Increasingly, people need to depend on 'action learning'; on doing things, monitoring the outcomes carefully and seeing how things work as a matter of practice.

References:
bullet 
bullet

Australian Government, Department of Environment and Heritage (DEH) - DEH Home > Supervising Scientist Division  > Environmental monitoring program

LOGICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR A VIABLE SYSTEM

Viability of Management Systems
A viable system is one that can maintain or sustain a separate existence. Thus, 'viability' and 'sustainability' have much the same meaning.  A viable management system needs to perform in a manner deemed satisfactory by those who provide the resources necessary for the system's continued operation. Thus, a management regime ultimately requires the continued support of those who provide the resources for management - taxpayers in a political system, shareholders or members in a corporate enterprise, or other benefactor in some private enterprise.

Performance Assessment
The performance of a management system depends on how well it satisfies its purpose. This depends in turn on developing understandings in relation to:
bulletthe purpose of the system
bulletcriteria that allow the judging of success
bulletstatistical indicators that allow the measuring of success
bulletmanagement reforms that may be deemed necessary if performance is deemed to be unsatisfactory

 

References:
bullet

Principia Cybernetica Web - Home > Monitoring -

bullet

 

PURPOSE OF A SYSTEM

Understanding of Purpose
People may have different ideas about the purpose of a system. As an example, an employer may see the purpose of a firm as making profits. In contrast, an employee may see the purpose of a the same firm as delivering respectable wages and salaries and a level of job satisfaction. However, paying increased wages might reduce profits. Under these circumstances, an employer and an employee might find themselves at cross-purposes. In effect, the parties involved see their circumstances as trading to mutual disadvantage. In other words, the perceptions are that there are winners and losers.

Where people see themselves as trading to mutual advantage,

In contrast, a different set of attitudes may prevail where increased wages may motivate workers to increase productivity and more than offset any loss in profits. Accordingly, people may ascribe different and either compatible or incompatible purposes to an organisation, depending on attitudes.

 

Statements of Purpose
Many organisations attempt to

Missions statements are often trite

References:

 

CRITERIA FOR JUDGING SUCCESS

 

 

STATISTICAL INDICATORS OF SUCCESS

Environmental indicators provide a means of quantifying various aspects of overall environmental quality, trends in environmental quality over time, and the relative success of environmental regulatory programs in maintaining and improving the quality of the environment. Indicators measure representative problems and the political and natural responses to those problems. When presented in a visual format, they can show, clearly, the discrepancy between the actual and desired conditions. Gathering statistics is expensive without careful organisation of information-gathering and processing activities. In many cases the cost of improving the data, in both human and financial terms, would be high in relation to the value of the information obtained. This is particularly true of relatively localized problems, many of which may prove irrelevant to broader-scale indicators.
 
UNITED NATIONS RESPONSES TO ISSUES AFFECTING THE GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT - AN HISTORICAL INTERPRETATION

LOGICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR A VIABLE SYSTEM

KEY UNITED NATIONS RESPONSES

Achieving consensus and compatibility of purpose to obtain a collective global response
bullet1972 - Stockholm - United Nations Conference on the Human Environment (UNCHE) Outcomes included the United Nations Declaration on the Human Environment (1972) and commencement of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (1973)
bullet1987 - Presentation of Our Common Future (often called 'The Brundtland Report') as a draft of the UN Program of Action on Sustainable Development
bullet1992 - Rio de Janeiro - United Nations Conference on the Environment and Development (UNCED)
Achieving consensus on the criteria by which success or failure can be assessed
bullet1992 - The Rio Declaration, and Agenda 21 (also on the UN gopher)
bullet1997 - Rio +5 - otherwise known as United Nations General Assembly Special Session (UNGASS), New York, 23-27 June 1997 (Official documentation)
Achieving consensus over the statistical indicators and targets that represent success or failure
bullet1993 - Formation of UN Department for Policy Coordination and Sustainable Development (DPCSD) (see Resolution (A/RES/47/191), 93rd plenary meeting of the UN General Assembly - 22 December 1992)
bullet1995 - DPCSD approves a work plan to prepare indicators of sustainable development
Environmental monitoring to record the success or failure of environmental policies and management 1997 - First Global Environment Outlook of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)
Reform of policies in the light of experience  

References:
bullet

UN Environmental monitoring | Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Commission on Sustainable Development, Ninth Session, 16 - 27 April 2001, New York - Indicators of sustainable development: framework and methodologies, Background Paper No.3, available online in PDF

bullet

Sustainable Development - Commission on Sustainable Development | Committee on Natural Resources | Committee on New and Renewable Sources of Energy | Intergovernmental Open-Ended Panel on Forests | Committee for Development Planning | Inter-agency Committee on Sustainable Development | High-level Advisory Board on Sustainable Development | Habitat II - Istanbul 1996 | Global Conference on Development of Small Island Developing States - Barbados 1994 | United Nations Conference on Environment and Development - Rio de Janeiro 1992 |

SUGGESTED FURTHER READING

bulletWorld Bank - Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Development (ESSD) - Environment Department Publications - Monitoring environmental progress | Land and Water Knowledge Management Node (LW-KMN)
bulletUnion of International Associations (UIA) - Monitoring the global environment - Undertaking global environmental monitoring and assessments - Reporting on global environmental status - Inadequate environmental monitoring
bulletWorld Stewardship Institute (WSI)- Latin American Alliance - Environment Articles - ISO 14000: The World adopts environmental standards -
bulletUS EPA - Advanced monitoring systems - Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP) and Regional Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (REMAP)
bulletWorld Resources Institute (WRI) - Guide to global environmental statistics