ANATOMY OF MARKET FAILURE
URL: http://www.spatialgovernance.com/economics/611lec04.htm
© John S. Cook - Created on 6 July 2004
Last modified 05/04/11 11:01 Australian EST

 

1. PARETO CRITERION AND OPTIMA

Introduction
Generally, modern markets put a price on commodities. In so far as this is a measure of 'willingness to pay', the price mechanism has enormous practical consequences in economic activity. However, although price quantifies 'willingness to pay', this notion needs to be differentiated from 'ability to pay'.

Markets are said to 'succeed' when they are seen as allocating resources to their best uses. Analysing the conditions where markets are seen as successful helps in understanding how markets can fail to achieve a satisfactory resource allocation.

The Pareto Criterion
When two people trade to mutual advantage without adverse effects on any third party, the economic well-being (or welfare) of the parties is said to improve. In essence, this is the Pareto Criterion for welfare improvement. This Criterion is not a testable proposition in a scientific sense. It is essentially tautological in character in that it helps to explain what is actually meant by 'welfare improvement' or an increase in 'allocative efficiency'. However, the Criterion depends on further qualifications, principally:
bulletAn individual who is a party to a trading transaction is deemed to be the best judge of his or her own welfare
bulletA party to a trading transaction does so freely and is not subjected to undue physical, moral, economic or other form of coercion in deciding on the terms of a contract for the exchange of goods or services.

Pareto Optima
A Pareto Optimum is said to occur when people exhaust their opportunities for trading to mutual advantage. In these circumstances, people obtain as much satisfaction as can be obtained from trading as free individuals. Moreover, since satisfactions in markets find expression in terms of 'willingness to pay', it follows that commodities achieve their 'highest and best use' as reflected in market valuations.

Pareto Optima Issues
While the idea of an 'optimum' in human satisfactions is attractive, it is also subject to significant qualifications:
bulletThe 'optimum' arrived at depends on an initial distribution of wealth. in other words, a different initial distribution of wealth might lead to a different 'optimum'
bulletBoth the initial distribution and the 'optimum' arrived at may be distinctly inequitable
bulletParties trade in accordance with the laws regarding property, contract and liability; and changes to this legal regime can influence the kinds of agreement that people are willing or able to negotiate

The Pareto Optimum follows an algorithm where increasing the volume of trade to mutual advantage allows ascendancy to a peak of human satisfaction. This is like a walker who seeks to ascend to higher ground by taking steps upward and eventually reaches a position where there is no immediate higher ground. However, just as the walker may look around from one peak and see higher ground on another peak, it is also conceivable that a new optimum might be found from a new starting point. Thus, it makes sense to think of a family of potential Pareto Optima rather than a single Optimum.

Summary
Generalising on aspects of human economic behaviour often becomes simplistic and misleading. However, simple ideas can become attractive in popular discussion that engages the public in the rationale for changes to public policy. Yet engaging the public is necessary if government is to be democratic. The reality is much more complex; and simple questions regarding the efficacy of markets require numerous qualifications if answers are to approximate the truth.

References:
bullet

Google search -  'Pareto efficiency' - Pareto optima -  'highest and best use' - 'willingness to pay' - 'ability to pay'

bullet

Australian Legal Information Institute (AUSTLII) search - 'highest and best use' - 'willingness to pay'

2. THE ROLE OF INFORMATION AND KNOWLEDGE IN CONSUMER CHOICE

Knowledge Assumptions and the Pareto Criterion
The Pareto Criterion rests on an assumption that people are the best judges of their own welfare. However, this assumption is questionable in a number of circumstances, as in cases of:
bulletchildren - where the law specifically acknowledges diminished responsibility for personal actions
bulletpeople displaying obsessive or addictive behaviours - alcohol or drug dependence and gambling, for example
bulletpeople with diminished mental faculties
bulletpeople seeking professional or technical advice as a discrete service or as part of a larger purchase
bulletdecisions that may occur under various degrees of uncertainty and involve considerable risk

Caveat Emptor
In markets where it is reasonable to expect buyers to be well acquainted with the consequences of a purchase, an ancient Roman principle of caveat emptor - let the buyer beware - is an appropriate social policy. Thus, the law requires people to be responsible in circumstances where that is a reasonable thing to expect.

Caveat Venditor
In some markets, sellers have a superior knowledge of what is involved in a transaction. Where there is a substantial information asymmetry that gives the vendor superior knowledge, the common law usually requires doubts in relation to a contract to be resolved in favour of the purchaser. In seeking professional or technical advice, a purchaser implicitly acknowledges

Producer Warranties, Indemnities and Disclaimers
Some producers provide warranties that set out the terms under which they will hold themselves liable for defects in product or services. Disclaimers set out things for which producers will not accept responsibility. These statements can influence the contracts in which that consumers and consumers are prepared to engage. However, on some aspects of trading, the law requires that producers accept liability and attempts to circumvent these requirements through warranties and disclaimers may be

Australian Trade Practice Legislation
Both Commonwealth and State Governments have legislation governing trade practices. The Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cwlth) contains a number of provisions directly related to maintaining integrity in information processes; especially false or misleading representation (at s.53) and unconscionable conduct (at s.51AB). The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) is responsible for many aspects of the administration of the Trade Practices Act.

Fair Trade in Queensland
The Queensland Government has legislative powers regarding the conduct of business in Queensland.

 

References:
bullet

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) - Home Page > Consumer rights - Business rights & obligations

bullet

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) - ACCC Home > Consumer rights - Business rights & obligations - Industry regulation & price monitoring - Mergers & authorising anti-competitive conduct

bullet

Queensland Government, Department of Tourism, Fair Trading and Wine Industry Development - Home Page > Fair Trading | Office of Fair Trading

bullet

Google search - caveat emptor - caveat venditor - information asymmetry - unconscionable conduct - producer warranties - indemnities

3. INSURANCE

Insurance in Managing Risk
Risk arises out of uncertainty. Thus, people may be fairly certain that accidents will occur but quite uncertain as to which individuals will become victims and when these events might occur. Insurance is a special form of contract that involves a spreading of a specific risk between policy holders. The contract involves payment of a premium by the insured and payment by the insurer in the event that the specified risk actually occurs.

Integrity in Information Processes
Insurance depends on the honesty of both the insurer and the insured in insurance contracts. This dependency finds expression in terms such as 'utmost good faith' and 'uberima fides' in how the contracting parties should behave. Insurance is subject to two corrupting influences in particular that are referred to as 'adverse selection' and 'moral hazard'.

 

Adverse Selection
People might be inclined to seek insurance if they perceive premiums to be low and to avoid insurance if they perceive premiums to be too high.  An important aspect of insurance is the capacity of an insurer to set a premium that is commensurate with the risk involved.

References:
bullet

Google search - utmost good faith - uberrima fides - adverse selection - moral hazard

4. THE ROLE OF MARKET POWER

Market Power and Capacity for Economic Coercion
Market power involves situations where one party is able to assume a dominant position in the striking of a bargain. Usually this involves some degree of economic coercion where one person has a degree of monopoly control over a commodity for which another person has a particular need and no readily available alternative. Strictly speaking, 'monopoly' refers to a market condition where there is a single seller - and monopsony refers to a situation where there is a single buyer. However, a situation of absolute monopoly may be rare. More usually, the monopoly may exist within a localised area and alternatives may be available though at some distance and with some economic penalty in attempting to access them.

Instances of monopoly occur where there is a single supplier of a good or service in an area. Some degree of monopoly might exist also . Examples of monopsony might occur if there is a single mill in an area to

 

 

Where there are many producers and consumers of a commodity, a person who does not receive satisfaction in one place can readily find alternatives in other places. However, when producers or consumers of a particular product are few in number, and there are no close substitutes in trying to negotiate supplies or sales, the effects of market power become more evident.

 

 

References:
bullet

Wikipedia > Market power - Monopoly - Monopsony - Oligopoly - Oligopsony -

5. EQUITY CONSIDERATIONS

Discrimination and Differentiation
A capacity for differentiation is a function of the observing power of an individual. A person is able to to see a difference between one circumstance and another. This observing power can have positive effects in assessing the suitability of using some person or thing for a particular task. However, it can also have negative effects in discriminating unfairly on the basis of a difference that ought to have no real bearing on the outcome. Typically, the kind of distinctions that may or may not deserve differential treatment include where a person lives, whether a person is male or female, a person's ethnic origins, religious persuasion or age.

In dealing with public policy issues, some forms of equity considerations become particularly important, as in:
bulletspatial equity - where people are not made to suffer unduly from a lack of essential services on account of where they happen to live - a matter of some importance in remote parts of Australia
bulletracial non-discrimination -
bulletanti-discrimination law -
bulletinter-generational equity - involving a sustainable use of resources that do not diminish the capacity for future generations to survive

 

References: